Split Gemini spec into two specs?
gmym at coopdot.com
Mon Mar 1 12:02:13 GMT 2021
Apparently, I sent this only to Oliver Simmons and not to the list.
On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 7:07 PM, Katarina Eriksson <gmym at coopdot.com> wrote:
> Oliver Simmons <oliversimmo at gmail.com> wrote:
> > At current the Gemini spec is dual-purpose, it describes the protocol,
> > and the text/gemini format.
> > Whilst gemtext is the "native" format for Gemini (as HTML is to HTTP),
> > one isn't required for the other to work, they are two distinct
> > things.
> > I think that they should be split into two specs, one for the protocol
> > and one for gemtext.
> > What would people think of this?
> > - Oliver Simmons (GoodClover)
> Here's a thread about it from May last year:
> It resulted in some rearranging of the order it appeared in the specification.
> Solderpunk's thoughts about it:
> Personally, I don't have strong opinion one way or the other.
More information about the Gemini