[Logarion] Next: federation (and Gopher) or Org-mode?

Andrew Miloradovsky andrew at interpretmaths.bid
Thu Apr 5 18:43:51 UTC 2018

Also, w.r.t. the headers' names:

I like the capitalized version more; partly because it emphasizes the
respect for established conventions (that's preferable), partly because
it is more aesthetic, IMO.

OTOH, I don't think renaming them to "the closest analogues" is a good
idea; because it would obscure their meaning, for the sake of what?
Make the format easier for newcomers to understand, than those with
pre-existing deep knowledge of HTTP and the e-mail format. — Better
borrow from *TeX.

On 04/05/2018 06:38 PM, Andrew Miloradovsky wrote:
> I suppose, federation is a more important feature, if it's missing at
> the moment, especially since there is already a Markdown support.
> On the other hand, Markdown is not a single format -- there are
> flavors. So sticking to a specific flavor, e.g. Org-mode's, and
> gradually implementing the features, would be wise too, IMO.
> On 03/22/2018 12:29 AM, SP wrote:
>> What would you like to see Logarion support next?
>> 1) Federarion and Gopher
>> 2) Org-mode file & syntax support

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/logarion/attachments/20180405/e170e38e/attachment.html>

More information about the Logarion mailing list